|
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: David P. Spath, Ph.D., Chief
Division of Drinking Water and
Environmental Management Branch
Department of Health Services
601 North 7th Street, Mail Stop 92
P.O. Box 942732
Sacramento, California 94234-7320
VIA: George V. Alexeeff, Ph.D., D.A.B.T.
Deputy Director for Scientific Affairs
VIA: Anna M. Fan, Ph.D., Chief
Pesticide and Environmental Toxicology Section
FROM: Robert A. Howd, Ph.D., Chief
Water Toxicology Unit
Pesticide and Environmental Toxicology Section
DATE: October 27, 2000
SUBJECT: PROPOSED NOTIFICATION LEVELS FOR SEC-BUTYLBENZENE AND TERT-BUTYLBENZENE
Staff of the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA)
have reviewed your Department's proposed Notification Levels of 80 ug/L
for sec-butylbenzene and tert-butylbenzene. OEHHA recommends action
levels of 260 ug/L for sec-butylbenzene and tert-butylbenzene. The
toxicological basis is the same, except for the use of an uncertainty
factor of three (3) instead of ten (10) for the subchronic to chronic
toxicity study extrapolation.
Sec-butylbenzene and tert-butylbenzene (Figure 1) are flammable
liquids used in United States commerce for synthetic organic chemistry,
as solvents, and tert-butylbenzene is used as a polymer linking
agent. Sec-butylbenzene is a component of crude oil (Wang and Fingas,
1995), vehicle emissions (Schroder and Dannecker, 1994; Sigsby et
al., 1987), ambient air (Juttner, 1986), and is a possible migrant
from microwave heating of thermoset polyester plastics (Gramshaw
et al., 1995). Tert-butylbenzene has been identified in landfill
gas (Eklund et al., 1998). Both compounds are on the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) Method 524.2 analyte list for monitoring
in groundwater, surface water, and drinking water and, in California,
are considered unregulated chemicals requiring monitoring (Title
22, California Code of Regulations §64450).

The routes of exposure to sec-butylbenzene and tert-butylbenzene
are ingestion, inhalation, and dermal. These chemicals are known
to cause eye and skin irritation, can cause irritation to mucous
membranes, and are considered aspiration hazards to the lung. However,
their prevalence in the environment is apparently rare, with only
one detection of tert-butylbenzene in California water supplies
among 9635 tests and no detections of sec-butylbenzene in 9637 tests
(California Department of Health Services, 2000). This compilation
covered the years 1984-1998. On the other hand, Wisconsin detected
sec-butylbenzene 110 times out of 2207 tests of wells (January-December
1997), with a high measurement of 60 ug/L. They also found 66 occurrences
of tert-butylbenzene out of 2168 tests, with a high value of 9 ug/L
(Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, 2000).
The toxicology of these isomers has not been thoroughly characterized.
Acute oral data have been reported. Eight out of ten rats died after
administration of approximately 4.3 g/kg sec-butylbenzene and 7/10
died after the same dose of tert-butylbenzene in olive oil (Gerarde,
1959). Dow Chemical (1954) reported that no deaths occurred among
four rats treated orally with 2 g/kg sec-butylbenzene and Sandmeyer
(1981) reported an LD50 of 2.24 g/kg for this isomer.
LD50s in rats for tert-butylbenzene ranged from 2.5 to
5.0 g/kg (U.S. EPA, 1997). These oral toxicity data indicate low
acute oral toxicity but are inadequate to derive a no-adverse-effect-level
(NOAEL) for either sec-butylbenzene or tert-butylbenzene for long-term
exposures.
The U.S. EPA National Center for Environmental Assessment (NCEA)
has recommended that a provisional reference dose (RfD) for these
compounds be derived from the toxicity data for a closely-related
branched-chain alkylbenzene, cumene (isopropylbenzene). NCEA states
that "confidence in this provisional RfD is very low, reflecting
low confidence in the RfD for cumene and the lack of suitable data
for the branched-chain butylbenzenes"(U.S. EPA, 1997). Confidence
can be enhanced somewhat by comparing cumene toxicity with other
saturated short?chain alkylbenzenes which are structurally similar.
These are summarized below:
| Chemical |
Critical Effect
|
NOAEL
(mg/kg/day)
|
LOAEL
(mg/kg/day)
|
 |
Increased liver and kidney weights in rats
|
233
|
446
|
|
Ethylbenzene

|
Histological alterations in the liver and
kidneys of rats
|
97
|
291
|
 |
Increased kidney weights in rats
|
110
|
331
|
(Adapted from U.S. EPA, 1977)
Cumene (isopropylbenzene) has a dose-schedule-adjusted NOAEL of
110 mg/kg-day based on 139 gavage doses to female rats in a 194-day
period (Wolf et al., 1956). Other data on cumene and similar alkylbenzenes
support this as an approximate NOAEL for the chemicals. OEHHA therefore
agrees that this NOAEL is appropriate to be used for sec-butylbenzene
and tert-butylbenzene. However, the lack of specific data justifies
a large uncertainty factor. An uncertainty factor of 3,000 is recommended
(three for subchronic to chronic extrapolation, ten for interspecies
extrapolation, ten for human variability, and ten for database deficiencies).
A public health protective concentration (C) for sec-butylbenzene
and tert-butylbenzene in drinking water can be derived from the
equation:
C = NOAEL x BW x RSC / UF x DWC =
(110 mg/kg-day)(70 kg)(0.2) / (3,000)(2 L/day) =
0.257 mg/L =(rounded) 260 ug/L
where:
NOAEL = no-observed-adverse-effect-level,
BW = body weight (adult),
RSC = relative source contribution,
UF = uncertainty factor, and
DWC = drinking water consumption (adult).
Based on the health protective concentration calculated, OEHHA
recommends and supports an Notification Level of 260 ppb (ug/L) for sec-butylbenzene
and an Notification Level of 260 ppb (ug/L) for tert-butylbenzene in drinking
water.
Should you have any questions about this review, please contact
me at (510) 622-3168 or Dr. Robert Haas at (510) 622-3172.
References
California Department of Health Services (2000). Detections of
Unregulated Chemicals Requiring Monitoring, http://www.dhs.ca.gov/ps/ddwem/chemicals
/mcl/unregulated.htm
Dow Chemical (1954). Results of range find toxicological test on
sec-butylbenzene. U.S. EPA/OTS Public Files, 8D submission. Microfiche
# OTS0515962 (as cited by U.S. EPA, 1997).
Eklund B, Anderson EP, Walker BL, and Burrows DB (1998). Characterization
of landfill gas composition at the Fresh Kills municipal solid-waste
landfill. Environ Sci Technol 32:2233?2237.
Gerarde HW (1959). Toxicological studies on hydrocarbons. III.
The biochemorphology of the phenylalkanes and phenylalkenes. AMA
Arch Ind Health 19:403-418 (as cited by U.S. EPA, 1997).
Gramshaw JW, Vandenburg HJ, and Lakin RA (1995). Identification
of potential migrants from samples of dual-ovenable plastics. Food
Add Contam 12:211-222.
Juttner F (1986). Analysis of organic compounds (VOC) in the forest
air of the southern Black Forest. Chemosphere 15:985-922.
Sandmeyer EE (1981). Aromatic Hydrocarbons. In: Patty's Industrial
Hygiene and Toxicology, Vol. IIB, 3rd Ed., GD Clayton, Ed. New York,
New York: John Wiley and Sons, p. 3253-3451 (as cited by U.S. EPA,
1997).
Schroder B and Dannecker W (1994). Vehicle emissions as the major
source of gaseous aromatic hydrocarbons at different locations in
Germany. Sci Tot Environ 146/147: 275-279.
Sigsby JE, Tejada S, Ray W, Lang JM, and Duncan JW (1987). Volatile
organic compound emissions from 46 in-use passenger cars. Environ
Sci Technol 21:466-475.
U.S. EPA (1997). Risk Assessment Issue Paper for: Derivation of
Provisional Chronic RfDs for n-Butylbenzene (CASRN 104-51-8), sec-Butylbenzene
(CASRN 135-98-8), tert-Butylbenzene (CASRN 98-06-6), and n-Propylbenzene
(CASRN 103-65-1). National Center for Environmental Assessment,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (97-009/6-5-97).
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (2000). Wisconsin Groundwater
Sampling Data - Top 100 Parameters from Jan-Dec 1997. http://www.dnr.state.wi.us/org/water/dwg/gw/grn97sm3.htm
Wang Z and Fingas M (1995). Differentiation of the source of spilled
oil and monitoring of the oil weathering process using gas chromatography-mass
spectrometry. J Chromat A712:321-343.
Wolf MA, Rowe VK, McCollister DD, Hollingsworth RL and Oyen F (1956).
Toxicological studies of certain alkylated benzenes and benzene.
Arch Ind Health 14:387-398.
|