|
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: David P. Spath, Ph.D., Chief
Division of Drinking Water and Environmental Management Branch
Department of Health Services
601 North 7th Street, Mail Stop 92
P.O. Box 942732
Sacramento, California 94234-7320
FROM: George V. Alexeeff, Ph.D., DABT
Deputy Director for Scientific Affairs
DATE: December 29, 1999
SUBJECT: PROPOSED NOTIFICATION LEVEL FOR METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE
Staff of the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA)
have reviewed your Department's proposed Notification Level of 170 ug/L
for Methyl Isobutyl Ketone (MIBK) based on a no-observable-adverse-effect-level
(NOAEL) taken from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (U.S.
EPA) Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables (HEAST) document (U.S.
EPA, 1997). OEHHA does not concur with this proposed Notification Level
for MIBK. By checking the U.S. EPA report cited in the HEAST Tables,
we have found that the NOAEL given in the HEAST Tables (250 mg/kg-day)
is actually a misprint. The real NOAEL reported by U.S. EPA (1987)
is 50 mg/kg-day. This NOAEL is based on a subchronic (13-week) gavage
study in Sprague-Dawley rats performed by Microbiological Associates
(1986). No adverse effects were observed at this dose, but higher
doses (250 mg/kg-day and 1,000 mg/kg-day) resulted in increased
relative kidney and liver weights and general nephropathy.
The HEAST Tables mention a combined uncertainty factor (UF) of
3,000 used to calculate a chronic reference dose (RfD) of 8x10-2
mg/kg-day. This combined UF is not mentioned in the U.S. EPA (1987)
report. The source of this combined UF is unclear, but it may have
come from an earlier U.S. EPA evaluation (perhaps unpublished).
We can reasonably estimate, based on conventional approaches, that
the combined uncertainty factor may have been derived in the following
manner:
ten for animal to human extrapolation,
ten for intrahuman variability,
ten for extrapolating from subchronic to chronic exposure,
three for limited database.
In the later U.S. EPA report (1987) the factor of three has been
omitted and only a combined UF of 1,000 is used.
A computer search of the literature did not reveal new studies
of MIBK by the oral route that could be used in place of the one
discussed above. Using the correct NOAEL of 50 mg/kg-day and the
same UFs listed above, an Notification Level for chronic exposure can
be calculated as follows.
C = NOAEL x BW x RSC / UF x DWC =
50 mg/kg-day x 70 kg x 0.2 / 3,000 x 2 L/day =
0.12 mg/L = 120 ug/L
Where:
NOAEL = No-Observed-Adverse-Effect-Level
BW = body weight
RSC = relative source contribution
UF = uncertainty factor (3,000 - from HEAST, adopted by OEHHA)
DWC = drinking water consumption
The value we have calculated is 120 ug/L, compared with your proposal
of 170 ug/L. The difference is due to using the correct NOAEL, and
using adult body weight and adult water consumption. This calculation
is for oral exposure only. MIBK has a vapor pressure of 15 mm Hg,
so there may be some potential for exposure by inhalation, as well
as by the dermal route. This new calculation is provided only as
a proposed Notification Level.
If you have questions on this review, please contact me at (510)
622-3150 or Dr. Anna Fan at (510) 622-3170.
References
Microbiological Associates (1986). Subchronic toxicity of methyl
isobutyl ketone in Sprague-Dawley Rats. Performed for Research Triangle
Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. Final Report.
Study No. 522104.
U.S. EPA (1987). Health Effects Assessment for Methyl Isobutyl
Ketone. Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office; Office of
Health and Environmental Assessment; Office of Research and Development;
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Cincinnati, Ohio. EPA/600/8-88/045.
U.S. EPA (1997). Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables (HEAST)
FY 1997 Update. Office of Research and Development; Office of Emergency
and Remedial Response, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington,
DC. EPA 540/R-97-036-PB97-921199.
|