|
June 11, 1998
International House Auditorium,
University of California at Berkeley
This workshop is being conducted by the California Environmental
Protection Agencys Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment
(OEHHA) to discuss issues related to the implementation of the authoritative
bodies mechanism for listing under Proposition 65. The agenda was
developed, in part, from comments received from interested parties.
Agenda items are for discussion; some changes to the process or
regulation may not be advisable or legally permissible.
The Proposition 65 statute requires the state to publish and update
at least annually a list of chemicals known to cause cancer or reproductive
toxicity. One of the mechanisms identified in the Proposition 65
statute is the listing of chemicals formally identified as causing
cancer or reproductive toxicity by a body considered to be authoritative
under Proposition 65 by the States qualified experts (i.e.,
the Carcinogen Identification Committee and Developmental and Reproductive
Toxicant Identification Committee of the OEHHA Science Advisory
Board). The regulatory guidance for listing by this mechanism is
set forth in Title 22, California Code of Regulations (CCR), Section
12306. The authoritative bodies currently identified are the US
Environmental Protection Agency, International Agency for Research
on Cancer, National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health,
US Food and Drug Administration, and National Toxicology Program.
Workshop Chair: Val Siebal, Chief Deputy Director, OEHHA
9:00 Welcome
Joan E. Denton, Director, OEHHA
Goals and objectives of the workshop
Val Siebal, Chief Deputy Director, OEHHA
9:15 Legal aspects of authoritative bodies implementation
- Ed Weil, Deputy Attorney General (20 min.)
- Proposition 65 statutory requirements and overview of 22 CCR
12306
- Criteria for formal identification
- Legal requirements when authoritative bodies findings
differ
- Toxic Release Inventory litigation
Public discussion and comment
10:15 BREAK
10:30 Designating authoritative bodies
- Lauren Zeise, Chief, OEHHA Reproductive and Cancer Hazard Assessment
Section (RCHAS) (15 min.)
- Public discussion and comment on issues, for example
- Whether there is a need to establish general criteria for authoritative
body designations
- To what extent does expert peer review function in the decision
to confer authoritative body designations
- Whether designations should be re-reviewed and, if so, under
what circumstances
11:30 Existing authoritative bodies
- Martha Sandy, Chief, OEHHA RCHAS Cancer Unit (20 min.)
- Public discussion and comment on issues, for example
- Authoritative bodies expertise and processes utilized
in their determinations
- Application of 12306 guidance
- The possible need for greater definition of specific activities
as authoritative within a large organization, such as US EPA
- US EPAs Toxic Release Inventory
12:30 LUNCH
1:30 Continuation of discussion on existing authoritative bodies
3:30 BREAK
3:45 Other bodies suggested by the public for designation as "authoritative"
- Marlissa Campbell, OEHHA RCHAS Reproductive Toxicology Unit
(5 min.)
- Suggestions from the public:
- Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
- International Programme on Chemical Safety
- Health Environment Canada
- Discussion and public comment on issues, such as the nature
of potential conflicts among existing and potential authoritative
bodies
- Next steps concerning designation of authoritative bodies
4:15 Scientific criteria for "as causing
cancer or reproductive toxicity" in 22 CCR 12306
- Jim Donald, Chief, OEHHA RCHAS Reproductive Toxicology Unit
(10 min.)
- Discussion and public comment
5:15 Public comment on additional issues
related to the authoritative bodies listing mechanism
5:30 Next Steps
ADJOURN
For questions regarding Proposition 65, please contact the Cynthia
Oshita in the Proposition 65 Implementation Program
For help with this web site please contact the Web
Mistress
|