| NOTICE
IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment
proposes to establish specific regulatory levels having no observable
effect for 2,4-D butyric acid (2,4-DB, 2,4-dichlorophenoxybutyric
acid), m-dinitrobenzene, hydramethylnon and N-methylpyrrolidone and
amend Title 22, California Code of Regulations, Section 12805.
PUBLIC PROCEEDINGS
A public hearing will be held on April 28, 2003, at which time
any person may present statements or arguments orally or in writing
relevant to the action described in this notice. The public hearing
will commence at 10:00 a.m. in the Central Valley Auditorium, California
Environmental Protection Agency Building, 1001 I Street, 2nd Floor,
Sacramento, California and will last until all business has been
conducted, or until 5:00 p.m.
Any written statements or arguments regardless of the form or method
of transmission must be received by OEHHA by 5:00 p.m. on April
28, 2003, which is hereby designated as the close of the written
comment period.
Written comments regarding this proposed action can be sent by
mail or by fax addressed to:
Susan Luong
Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment
Proposition 65 Implementation Program
P. O. Box 4010
Sacramento, California 95812-4010
FAX: (916) 323-8803
Telephone: (916) 445-6900
Comments sent by courier should be delivered to:
Susan Luong
Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment
1001 I Street, 19th Floor
Sacramento, California 95814
Comments may also be transmitted via e-mail addressed to: (sluong@oehha.ca.gov).
It is requested but not required that written statements or arguments
be submitted in triplicate.
CONTACT
Please direct inquiries concerning processing of the action described
in this notice to Susan Luong or Cynthia Oshita, in writing at the
address given above, or by telephone at (916) 445-6900. Inquiries
concerning the substance of the action may be directed to Colleen
Heck, Chief Counsel, in writing at the address given above, or by
telephone at (916) 324-2831.
INFORMATIVE DIGEST/POLICY STATEMENT OVERVIEW
The Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, commonly
known as Proposition 65 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"),
prohibits a person in the course of doing business from knowingly
and intentionally exposing any individual to a chemical that has
been listed as known to cause cancer or reproductive toxicity without
first giving clear and reasonable warning to such individual (Health
and Safety Code Section 25249.6). The Act also prohibits such persons
from knowingly discharging a listed chemical into water or onto
or into land where such chemicals pass or probably will pass into
any source of drinking water (Health and Safety Code Section 25249.5).
For chemicals known to the state to cause reproductive toxicity,
an exemption from the warning requirement is provided by the Act
when a person in the course of doing business is able to demonstrate
that an exposure for which he or she is responsible produces no
observable reproductive effect, assuming exposure at 1,000 times
the level in question (Health and Safety Code Section 25249.10).
The maximum dose level at which a chemical has no observable reproductive
effect is referred to as the no observable effect level (NOEL).
The Act also provides an exemption from the prohibition against
discharging a listed chemical into sources of drinking water if
the amount discharged does not constitute a "significant amount"
as defined and the discharge is in conformity with all other laws
and regulatory requirements (Health and Safety Code Sections 25249.9
and 25249.11). The term "significant amount" is defined
in a manner that equates to the level that triggers the warning
requirement. Thus, these exemptions apply when an exposure or discharge
does not exceed the NOEL divided by 1,000. One method by which a
person in the course of doing business may determine whether an
exposure or a discharge is exempt from the Act is by application
of the specific regulatory level for the chemical in Section 12805.
The levels in Section 12805 represent the maximum dose level at
which the chemical has no observable reproductive effect, given
an exposure at one thousand (1,000) times the level in question.
The amendment to Section 12805 would adopt the following regulatory
levels for chemicals known to the state to cause reproductive toxicity:
| Chemical |
MADL, in units micrograms per day |
Reference |
| 2,4-D
butyric acid (2,4-DB, 2,4-dichlorophenoxybutyric acid) |
910 |
OEHHA (2003a) |
| m-Dinitrobenzene |
38 (oral) |
OEHHA (2003b) |
| Hydramethylnon |
120 (oral) |
OEHHA (2003c) |
| N-Methylpyrrolidone |
3,200 (inhalation)
17,000 (dermal) |
OEHHA (2003d) |
The risk assessments which were used by the Office of Environmental
Health Hazard Assessment to determine the stated levels are as follows:
Follow the links to download pdf copies of the risk assessments.
Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA, 2003a).
Proposition
65 Maximum Allowable Dose Level (MADL) for Male Reproductive Toxicity
for 2,4-D Butyric Acid. OEHHA Reproductive and Cancer Hazard
Assessment Section, California Environmental Protection Agency,
Sacramento, March 2003.
Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA, 2003b).
Proposition 65 Maximum
Allowable Dose Level (MADL) for Reproductive Toxicity for m-Dinitrobenzene
for Oral Exposure. OEHHA Reproductive and Cancer Hazard Assessment
Section, California Environmental Protection Agency, Sacramento,
March 2003.
Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA, 2003c).
Proposition
65 Maximum Allowable Dose Level (MADL) for Reproductive Toxicity
for Hydramethylnon for Oral Exposure. OEHHA Reproductive and
Cancer Hazard Assessment Section, California Environmental Protection
Agency, Sacramento, March 2003.
Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA, 2003d).
Proposition 65 Maximum
Allowable Dose Level (MADL) for Reproductive Toxicity for N-Methylpyrrolidone
for Dermal and Inhalation Exposure. OEHHA Reproductive and Cancer
Hazard Assessment Section, California Environmental Protection Agency,
Sacramento, March 2003.
AUTHORITY
Health and Safety Code Section 25249.12.
REFERENCE
Health and Safety Code Sections 25249.5, 25249.6, 25249.9, 25249.10
and 25249.11.
IMPACT ON LOCAL AGENCIES OR SCHOOL DISTRICTS
OEHHA has determined the proposed regulatory action would not pose
a mandate on local agencies or school districts nor does it require
reimbursement by the State pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section
17500) of Division 4 of the Government Code. The Office of Environmental
Health Hazard Assessment has also determined that no nondiscretionary
costs or savings to local agencies or school districts will result
from the proposed regulatory action.
COSTS OR SAVINGS TO STATE AGENCIES
OEHHA has determined that no savings or increased costs to any
State agency will result from the proposed regulatory action.
EFFECT ON FEDERAL FUNDING TO THE STATE
OEHHA has determined that no costs or savings in federal funding
to the State will result from the proposed regulatory action.
EFFECT ON HOUSING COSTS
OEHHA has determined that the proposed regulatory action will have
no effect on housing costs.
SIGNIFICANT STATEWIDE ADVERSE ECONOMIC IMPACT DIRECTLY AFFECTING
BUSINESS, INCLUDING ABILITY TO COMPETE
OEHHA has made an initial determination that the adoption of the
regulation will not have a significant statewide adverse economic
impact directly affecting businesses, including the ability of California
businesses to compete with businesses in other states.
IMPACT ON THE CREATION, ELIMINATION, OR EXPANSION OF JOBS/BUSINESSES
OEHHA has determined that the proposed regulatory action will not
have any impact on the creation or elimination of jobs, the creation
of new businesses or the elimination of existing businesses, or
the expansion of businesses currently doing business within the
State of California.
COST IMPACTS ON REPRESENTATIVE PRIVATE PERSONS OR BUSINESSES
OEHHA is not aware of any cost impacts that a representative private
person or business would necessarily incur in reasonable compliance
with the proposed action.
EFFECT ON SMALL BUSINESSES
OEHHA has determined that the proposed regulation will not impose
any requirements on small business. Rather, the proposed regulation
will assist small businesses subject to the Act in determining whether
or not an exposure for which they are responsible is subject to
the warning requirement or discharge prohibition.
CONSIDERATION OF ALTERNATIVES
In accordance with Government Code Section 11346.5(a)(13), OEHHA
must determine that no reasonable alternative considered by OEHHA,
or that has otherwise been identified and brought to the attention
of OEHHA would be more effective in carrying out the purpose for
which the action is proposed or would be as effective and less burdensome
to affected private persons than the proposed action.
AVAILABILITY OF STATEMENT OF REASONS AND TEXT OF PROPOSED REGULATIONS
OEHHA has prepared and has available for public review an Initial
Statement of Reasons for the regulation, all the critical information
upon which the regulation is based, and the text of the regulation.
A copy of the Initial Statement of Reasons, a copy of the text of
the regulation and copies of the risk assessments which were used
by OEHHA to determine the MADLs are available upon request from
OEHHA's Proposition 65 Implementation Program at the address and
telephone number indicated above. These documents are also posted
on OEHHA's Web site at www.oehha.ca.gov.
Follow this link
to download a copy of the Initial Statement of Reasons
AVAILABILITY OF CHANGED OR MODIFIED TEXT: The full text of any
regulation which is changed or modified from the express terms of
the proposed action will be made available at least 15 days prior
to the date on which OEHHA adopts the resulting regulation. Notice
of the comment period on changed regulations and the full text will
be mailed to individuals who testified or submitted written comments
at the public hearing, whose comments were received by OEHHA during
the public comment period, and who request notification from OEHHA
of availability of such changes. Copies of the notice and the changed
regulation will also be available at the OEHHA's Web site at www.oehha.ca.gov.
Follow
this link to download a copy of the changed or modified text.
FINAL STATEMENT OF REASONS
A copy of the Final Statement of Reasons may be obtained, when
it becomes available, from OEHHA's Proposition 65 Implementation
Program at the address and telephone
number indicated above. The Final Statement of Reasons will also
be available at the OEHHA's Web site at www.oehha.ca.gov.
OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL
HEALTH HAZARD ASSESSMENT
Allan Hirsch
Deputy Director
External and Legislative Affairs
Dated: March 4, 2003
You will need the free program Adobe Acrobat Reader to view or
print PDF files 
For questions regarding Proposition 65, please contact the Cynthia
Oshita in the Proposition 65 Implementation Program
For help with this web site please contact the Web
Mistress
|