Skip to: Content | Footer | Accessibility

Air Toxicology and Epidemiology

OEHHA Responses To Public Comments On: Determination Of Acute Toxicity Exposure Levels For Airborne Toxicants And Evaluation Of Acute Non-Cancer Health Effects
[01/29/99]

The comments received by OEHHA included below are grouped alphabetically by commentator. The OEHHA response to each comment follows in separate paragraphs. Comments below were either directly transcribed from the original comments received, or were excerpted and summarized, as indicated.

Download the Responses to Comments as a pdf file here

Start | Back | Next

Table Of Contents

1. Bay Area League of Industrial Associations
2. California Cotton Ginners Association
3. California Mining Association
4. Chemical Industry Council of California
5. Chemical Manufacturers Association
6. Chemical Manufacturers Association (specific panels)
7. Carbon Disulfide Panel
8. Ethylene Glycol Ethers Panel
9. Isopropanol Panel
10. Ketones Panel
11. Methyl Bromide Panel
12. Phenol Task Group
13. Citizens for a Better Environment
14. City Of Los Angeles, Bureau of Sanitation
15. The Clorox Company
16. Harding Lawson Associates
17. Metal Finishing Association of Southern California
18. Monsanto Company
19. Mothers of East Los Angeles / La Causa
20. National Particleboard and UF Resin Manufacturers Associations
21. National Particleboard and UF Resin Manufacturers Associations, cont.
22. Pacific Gas and Electric Company
23. R2C2 Company
24. Santa Clara Manufacturing Group
25. Society of the Plastics Industry
26. Southern California Edison Company
27. Texaco Incorporated
28. Working Group on Community Right to Know
29. UNOCAL Corporation
30. Western States Petroleum Association
31. OEHHA Responses to Comments Received from ICF-Kaiser (for WSPA)
32. Chemical-Specific Comments

TOC | Back | Next